Musrepova, B; Biedenbach, T and Jacobsson, M (2026) Orchestrators, ambassadors, and brokers: A micro-foundations perspective on informal roles in the enabling of digital ambidexterity in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 44(4), pp. 241-259. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Over the last decade, extensive research on digitalization in construction has focused on understanding the challenges and potentials of new digital technologies at both industry and firm levels. Less attention has been dedicated to the underlying micro-foundations required to successfully exploit existing and explore new digital technologies, so-called digital ambidexterity. More specifically, despite awareness of individual workers' pivotal role in digital transformation, the mundane actions of project practitioners and how these can enable digital ambidexterity have not yet been explored. Therefore, this article aims to increase the understanding of practitioners' role in enabling digital ambidexterity. Empirically, the study is based on 15 semi-structured interviews, complemented by 5 days of on-site observations and the collection of documents. Through an inductive analysis, the study identifies sixteen practices enacted by three informal roles that are shown to play a key role in the digitalization process. The practices are mapped and aggregated into a process model that explains how the practices are interlinked, enabling digital ambidexterity. The paper provides critical insights into the micro-level capabilities required to enable digital ambidexterity in construction firms.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ambidexterity; construction firm; digital technologies; micro-foundations; project actors |
| Index terms: | transformation, broker, interview, ambidexterity, practitioner, digitalization, documents, digital technology, foundations, construction firm |
| Subjects: | business, organization, computing systems, structural engineering, strategic management, practitioner, data collection methods, digital technology, profession, professional development |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here