Work rate-based indicators for improving project performance regression models

Ottaviani, F M; De Marco, A; Narbaev, T and Ballesteros-Pérez, P (2026) Work rate-based indicators for improving project performance regression models. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(1), pp. 99-112. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Performance analysis is a critical component of project monitoring that provides the basis for evaluating cost and duration estimates at completion. Although Earned Value Analysis (EVA) techniques such as Earned Value Management (EVM) and Earned Schedule (ES) are widely used, they only focus on cost and time features and overlook the relationship between cost and schedule performances. Previous works have provided additional indicators and demonstrated the implications of work rate variations on project performance, but have not integrated the two streams. Thus, this study aims to improve project monitoring by developing and validating three novel indicators for increasing the accuracy and precision of regression-based performance forecasting models. The indicators quantify the project's relative phase, work rate, and work rate acceleration. Validation was performed using 60 real construction project data by comparing the performance of multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network models with and without these indicators in cost and duration forecasting. Then, the MLPs were benchmarked against EVM and ES models on the same dataset. Results show that including work rate-based indicators in the MLPs improves their accuracy and precision and that MLPs can outperform EVA techniques.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: earned value management; estimate at completion; machine learning; monitoring and control; multilayer perceptron; neural network; performance analysis; project management
Index terms: estimate, duration, project management, acceleration, performance analysis, monitoring, project performance, multilayer, regression model, forecasting, machine learning, dataset, project monitoring, variation, earned value analysis, stream, construction project, validation, neural network, accuracy, earned value management, schedule performance
Subjects: water management, contractual condition, professional development, project management theory and practice, specialized materials and systems, statistical analysis, project controls, data management, control systems, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, production management
Topics: Sustainability, Project Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Site Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here