Gu, J and Wu, Z (2026) Promoting project digital responsibility for sustainable digital construction: A perspective on the coupling of influencing factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 04026050, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Project digital responsibility is critical for sustainable construction; however, to our best knowledge, it has not yet received significant attention from the construction industry. Project digital responsibility promotion (PDRP) remains underdeveloped. Exploring the PDRP influencing factors is critical to advancing its adoption and enhancing the project digital responsibility implementation. We combined on-site research, expert interviews, and document analysis to evaluate the influencing factors and their coupling relationships. By identifying PDRP influencing factors, constructing an N-K model, developing a complex network model, and analyzing influencing factors across multiple dimensions, we extracted the key influencing factors. The results indicate that: (1) the frequency of PDRP events does not positively correlate with the corresponding factor coupling strength; and (2) the more dimensional factors involved in the coupling, the better the PDRP will be facilitated. This may explain why previous governance strategies, which developed in response to the frequency of PDRP events, were ineffective. Internal stakeholders are the first-level factors with the highest coupling strength. Government, digital responsibility disclosure systems, social benefits, social climates, and economic benefits are the five key influencing second-level factors on PDRP. Few studies, to our best knowledge, have focused on PDRP influencing factors. Therefore, this study provides valuable insights into the project responsibility governance field, provides practical know-how for promoting project digital responsibility, deepens our understanding of how factors influence PDRP, and assesses the magnitude of their impact.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complex network; coupling analysis; influencing factor; n-k model; project digital responsibility promotion |
| Index terms: | strategy, sustainable construction, social benefit, interview, construction industry, implementation, dimension, coupling, document analysis, digital construction, governance, promotion, influencing factor |
| Subjects: | sustainable construction, theoretical framing, contractual arrangements, information systems, systems engineering, industry analysis, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data science, business, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Governance, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here