Quantifying the social loafing led productivity issues in architecture, engineering and construction project teams

Maqbool, R and Shaji, A (2026) Quantifying the social loafing led productivity issues in architecture, engineering and construction project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(1), pp. 620-640. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry is one of the vast industries with a lot of productivity issues within. Teams as an integral part of the industry face many problems, of which social loafing is considered as a barrier. This research deals with a few barriers that contribute to social loafing leading to productivity challenges in the AEC industry. There are three major barriers identified as contributors to social loafing which also induces productivity challenges in the industry, from the literature study: cultural diversity, task invisibility and distributive justice. Design/methodology/approach – The study adopted the quantitative questionnaire survey method approach, for which the respondents were selected globally through snowball sampling and a total of 443 responses were gathered. Different analysis approaches like the correlation coefficient, and structural equation modeling (SEM), were taken to analyze the survey data. Findings – The SEM results showed that mediation factor, social loafing, is directly related to AEC productivity challenges and acts as a mediation for barriers like cultural diversity and task invisibility. Distributive justice was not found to have a direct relationship with AEC productivity challenges or even through social loafing. Originality/value – This study could be beneficial for the CEOs, general managers and directors as they can use this study to encourage an employee friendly environment. Also, industry experts like engineers, architects, project managers can access this study to further improve the organizational culture and instill better employee values.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: AEC industry; challenges; culture; productivity; social loafing; task invisibility; teams
Index terms: sampling, architect, productivity, engineer, construction project team, project manager, organizational culture, questionnaire, methodology, survey, face, structural equation modelling, mediation, manager, justice
Subjects: psychology, legal systems, practitioner, research methods, project delivery, profession, data collection methods, dispute resolution, sociology, statistical analysis, management
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Project Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here