Malla, V; K.V, P and Delhi, V S K (2026) Analysing inhibitors to BIM implementation: A social network theoretical perspective. Construction Innovation, 26(1), pp. 198-218. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – Building information modelling (BIM) implementation in the design, construction and operations (DCO) industry is increasingly becoming essential. While BIM has been adopted on a larger scale in many developed economies, its acceptance is still in the embryonic phases for developing nations in the DCO industry. This study aims to identify the inhibitors to BIM implementation through the social network theoretical lens, intending to understand the associations among the barriers in the Indian context. Subsequently, recommend strategies to mitigate the barriers from the academic practitioner's perspective. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed methods research was adopted, commencing with comprehensive literature reviews to recognise various inhibitors to BIM implementation. These identified barriers were further examined through the questionnaire survey (n = 71). BIM implementation barrier network (BIBN) was created using University of California at Irvine Network (UCINET) is a powerful social network analysis software that functions on the principle of social network theory. The experts' opinions were captured through the BIBN network through interviews. Network properties such as eigen vector centrality, betweenness centrality, degree centrality, in-degree and out-degree and clustering coefficient were computed, and the metrics were analysed further. Findings – Twenty-six BIM implementation barriers were initially identified. A questionnaire survey was conducted. The chain reaction can be minimised by prioritising and regulating these barriers. The issues were categorised into fourfold clusters (standardisation, policy and process, cultural and human resources, change management and operational) issues were generated from the exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The obstacles and barriers resulting from the other main barriers associated with it can be minimised by reducing the challenges with high eigenvector centrality but low betweenness importance. Practical implications – This study proves to accelerate sustainable BIM implementation growth in developing nations; this research study assists BIM stakeholders in developing coping mechanisms to monitor and remove BIM implementation barriers. Originality/value – Analysing the associativity of the BIM implementation barriers through sociograms for developing nations is a novel concept with this research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; building information modelling; construction industry; exploratory factor analysis; social network analysis; sociograms |
| Index terms: | interview, exploratory factor analysis, survey, developing nation, social network analysis, change management, literature review, social network, strategy, practitioner, questionnaire, methodology, human resource, prioritizing, social network theory, becoming, mixed method, eigenvector, building information modelling, standardization, coping, construction industry, implementation, clustering |
| Subjects: | management, performance measurement, measurement and scaling, sociology, decision analysis, information systems, statistical analysis, industry analysis, data collection methods, data science, data analysis and analytics, research methods, development economics, behavioral psychology, philosophical process, practitioner, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Human Resources, International Construction, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Risk Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here