Mohammed, A; Bahatheq, A; Ghaithan, A; Alshibani, A; Mazher, K M and Alrashidi, A (2026) Predicting schedule delays of construction projects in the oil and gas industry: Comparative study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 16(2), pp. 286-303. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – Delays in oil and gas construction projects present major challenges due to the sector's complex operations, high capital investment and strict timelines. Such disruptions affect project execution and can have serious socioeconomic impacts. The purpose of this paper is to identify key factors contributing to schedule delays and develop predictive models using artificial neural networks (ANN), decision trees (DTs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) to estimate delay percentages. Design/methodology/approach – This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. Expert interviews and a literature review identified and prioritized key delay factors. Data from completed oil and gas construction projects selected through purposive sampling to reflect varied sizes, complexities and locations were analyzed using correlation and outlier tests to ensure reliability. Predictive models: ANNs, DTs and MLR, were then developed, trained and validated with real project data. Findings – Design consulting experience, project location and scope changes are assessed as the leading factors influencing delay percentages in oil and gas construction projects. The MLR demonstrated the highest accuracy, exceeding 96%, outperforming both ANNs and DTs. Originality/value – This paper focused on the quantitative models rather than the qualitative aspects of predicting schedule delays in construction projects in the oil and gas industry. The proposed models support planning stages by enabling more realistic project schedules and decision-making processes. The proposed models also empower project stakeholders to optimize project outcomes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; construction projects; data-driven; delays percentages; machine learning; project schedule |
| Index terms: | schedule delay, decision-making process, project outcome, comparative study, decision tree, purposive sampling, estimate, oil and gas, scope change, interview, capital investment, literature review, project data, accuracy, artificial neural network, methodology, construction project, project stakeholder, machine learning, complexity |
| Subjects: | production management, research methods, scope management, project completion, economic analysis, professional development, industry analysis, systems engineering, project controls, sociology, decision analysis, data collection methods, research design and methodology, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here