Xu, D; Agyekum, K; Manu, P; Cheung, C; Che Ibrahim, C K I; Mahamadu, A M and Perez, P A (2026) Design for safety (dfs) implementation in the construction industry: A study of design professionals in Northern China. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 24(1), pp. 1-23. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose – Design for Safety (DfS) has been studied as an effective method to reduce injuries and fatalities in construction. Although the benefits of implementing DfS are gradually being recognised, there is limited research on DfS in developing countries, including China. Therefore, this study aims to explore the implementation of DfS among design professionals in the northern geographical region of China. Design/methodology/approach – Adopting the quantitative research method, a questionnaire survey was used to obtain data from 68 design professionals on various aspects of DfS implementation, and the data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (i.e. t-tests). Findings – The results show that the extent of engagement in DfS practices among the design professionals is moderate despite high awareness and positive attitude towards the concept of DfS. The results also revealed a significant difference in the extent of implementation of DfS practices between designers who have received DfS-related education and training and those who have not. Furthermore, the findings reveal that DfS industry guidance and legislation are the most influential factors that affect DfS implementation in China. Originality/value – Overall, the study offers some positive outlook of DfS implementation among design professionals in Northern China and underscores the significance of training, education, industry guidance, client influence and legislation in efforts to enhance DfS implementation. The findings should offer a headway to assist in DfS implementation in various geographical settings in China.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; construction; design for safety; developing countries; prevention through design; survey |
| Index terms: | legislation, developing country, injury, survey, methodology, influential factor, design for safety, questionnaire, China, quantitative research, designer, construction industry, prevention, implementation, fatalities, statistics, education and training |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, risk assessment, profession, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, health risk and incident analysis, legal systems, contractual arrangements, professional education, research methods, development economics, financial risk, health safety and environment, Geography |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Procurement, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here