Barriers to the implementation of enterprise risk management in Indian construction firms

Prakash, A and Ambekar, S (2026) Barriers to the implementation of enterprise risk management in Indian construction firms. Construction Innovation, 26(2), pp. 440-463. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose – Implementing enterprise risk management (ERM) systems in construction firms of developing countries like India is critical for targeting strong risk management strategies that support their growth. It requires such firms to holistically understand the major barriers in terms of their definitions, relationships with one another and interdependencies. Thus, this study aims to identify, model and analyze the barriers to implementing ERM in construction firms using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Design/methodology/approach – This study used a Delphi process to identify barriers to the implementation of ERM in Indian construction firms, ISM to model them and Matrice d'Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement (MICMAC) to analyze their interrelationships. Findings – The study's results revealed that individual-level factors are the most important among the barriers present at the lowest level in the hierarchical model, whereas organizational commitment with the highest dependence power is present at the highest level in the hierarchical model. Research limitations/implications – Since the usage of ERM in the construction industry is highly culture-dependent and may have regional nuances, the data on ERM usage might accurately reflect the Indian construction industry but may not apply to other regions. Practical implications – This study can be used to develop effective strategies to improve the implementation of ERM in construction firms in developing countries like India. Social implications – ERM is crucial for managing risks in Indian construction firms due to the high degree of complexity and uncertainty associated with construction projects coming from changes due to technological advancement, regulatory changes, changes in consumer preferences, global competition and other socioeconomic and political factors. Originality/value – The study's results will help researchers and practitioners working in the construction industry of developing countries like India to identify the challenges in adopting ERM systems. It will guide construction firms to appropriately develop risk management strategies for managing the inevitable risks in their complex project environments. This will help improve their contribution to the country's economic development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; construction; enterprise; erm; ISM; MICMAC; risk management
Index terms: construction project, strategy, developing country, economic development, enterprise risk management, practitioner, risk management, complexity, preference, India, construction industry, interpretive structural modelling, competition, construction firm, complex project, political factor, organizational commitment, methodology, implementation
Subjects: risk assessment, systems engineering, management, sociology, financial risk, production management, industry analysis, market analysis, development economics, political science, economic development, practitioner, organization, data analysis and analytics, strategic project management, research methods, Geography, contractual arrangements, decision-making and reasoning
Topics: Sustainability, Risk Management, Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Procurement, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, International Construction, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here