Exploring blue-green roof for a sustainable built environment in South Africa

Aghimien, D O; Aliu, J and Aigbavboa, C (2026) Exploring blue-green roof for a sustainable built environment in South Africa. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(1), pp. 364-383. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – The current adverse changes in climatic conditions have necessitated innovative nature-based solutions like blue-green roofs to ensure sustainable built environments. The use of blue-green roofs in combating climate change issues has continued to grow, and its benefits are showcased in many countries' studies. However, there is an absence of reports on the use of this approach in South Africa. Therefore, in ensuring a sustainable built environment through nature-based solutions, this study explored the built environment professional's knowledge of blue-green roofs, the hindrances to their use and motivations for much wider use of blue-green roofs in the country. Design/methodology/approach – Based on the nature of the study, a quantitative design was adopted and data were obtained from professionals within the built environment through a questionnaire. Data analyses were conducted using the Cronbach alpha test, Kruskal–Wallis H-Test, exploratory factor analysis and fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Findings – The findings revealed a growing knowledge of blue-green roofs, albeit its slow adoption in the country. Also, five critical clusters of hindrances affecting the use of blue-green roofs were identified. These are understanding the blue-green roof concepts, technical, economic, regulation and client hindrances. Furthermore, the ability to manage stormwater properly, provide climate change adaptation and deliver sustainable buildings were the key motivating factors that could drive the use of this innovative solution. Practical implications – This study offers actionable insights for built environment professionals and stakeholders to address the hindrances to using blue-green roofs in South Africa. Strategies such as improved education, financial incentives and policy development can help overcome some notable hindrances and promote the widespread adoption of blue-green roofs. Originality/value – The slow adoption of blue-green roofs and the scant nature of research within the built environment required adequate attention to which this current research contributes. Theoretically, being one of the foremost studies in South Africa to explore blue-green roofs, the findings offer a foundation for future studies seeking to explore this roofing system in the country further.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: blue-green roofs; green construction; nature-based solutions; South Africa; sustainable construction
Index terms: motivation, strategy, sustainable construction, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, data analysis, financial incentive, exploratory factor analysis, climate change, South Africa, stormwater, regulation, questionnaire, green roof, sustainable building, methodology, roofing, adaptation, nature-based solution, climatic condition, future study, built environment
Subjects: user focus, climate science, psychology, economic analysis, research methods, Geography, sustainable design, sustainable construction, decision-making and optimization, data collection methods, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, design practice, management, biodiversity, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental engineering, statistical analysis, political science
Topics: Geographical Context, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Governance, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here