Gasue, R; Aklashie, S; Dompey, A M A; Agyekum, K and Opoku, D (2026) Implementing materials passports in the construction industry: Empirical evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 44(1), pp. 15-35. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose – The increasing concern for waste reduction in the global construction industry has led to diverse sustainable approaches emerging globally in the past decade. Material passport (MP), a growing approach, has been seen to be very promising. This study examines the implementation of materials passports in the Ghanaian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach – The study adopted the quantitative research method. Having reviewed literature related to this study, questionnaires served as a means of soliciting the views of 77 professionals in the built environment in the Ghanaian construction industry on the theme under investigation. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used to analyze the data retrieved. Findings – Findings from the study revealed that Ghanaian construction professionals possessed a low level of awareness of the concept of MPs. However, they showed a massive willingness to adopt MPs in their professional practice. The findings further revealed that the professionals believed challenges such as the lack of knowledge, complexities of MP in terms of its preparation, and lack of quality assurance for recovered products hinder the adoption of MPs. The findings also revealed that strategies such as adequate training and education, policies and regulations, and adequate stakeholder engagement could aid in the implementation of MPs in the Ghanaian construction industry. Originality/value – For the concept of MPs to gain a firm foundation globally, its perception and implementation must be explored thoroughly. This empirical study, being the first to investigate MP implementation in Ghana, has provided insights into the topic from the perspective of professionals operating in the Ghanaian construction industry. The paper reveals information on the practice of MPs from the context of a typical developing country.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; construction industry; materials passports; recycling; reuse; sustainable development goals; waste minimization |
| Index terms: | implementation, construction industry, stakeholder engagement, built environment, sustainable development goal, investigation, construction professional, empirical study, global construction, statistical analysis, circular economy, Ghana, recycling, quantitative research, low level, complexity, professional practice, waste reduction, materials passport, regulation, evidence, questionnaire, methodology, quality assurance, strategy, minimization, developing country |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, evaluation and assessment methods, strategic management, waste management, quality assurance, sustainability assessment, research methods, algorithms, Geography, sustainable design, material science and engineering, development economics, data science, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, community and social dimensions, measurement and scaling, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, systems engineering, political science, management, professional development |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here