A scoping review and analysis of green construction research: A machine learning aided approach

Fernando, A; Siriwardana, C; Law, D; Gunasekara, C; Zhang, K and Gamage, K (2026) A scoping review and analysis of green construction research: A machine learning aided approach. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(1), pp. 62-91. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – The increasing urgency to address climate change in construction has made green construction (GC) and sustainability critical topics for academia and industry professionals. However, the volume of literature in this field has made it impractical to rely solely on traditional systematic evidence mapping methodologies. Design/methodology/approach – This study employs machine learning (ML) techniques to analyze the extensive evidence-base on GC. Using both supervised and unsupervised ML, 5, 462 relevant papers were filtered from 10, 739 studies published from 2010 to 2022, retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Findings – Key themes in GC encompass green building materials, construction techniques, assessment methodologies and management practices. GC assessment and techniques were prominent, while management requires more research. The results from prevalence of topics and heatmaps revealed important patterns and interconnections, emphasizing the prominent role of materials as major contributors to the construction sector. Consistency of the results with VOSviewer analysis further validated the findings, demonstrating the robustness of the review approach. Originality/value – Unlike other reviews focusing only on specific aspects of GC, use of ML techniques to review a large pool of literature provided a holistic understanding of the research landscape. It sets a precedent by demonstrating the effectiveness of ML techniques in addressing the challenge of analyzing a large body of literature. By showcasing the connections between various facets of GC and identifying research gaps, this research aids in guiding future initiatives in the field.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; green construction; machine learning; ML aided; scoping review; sustainability
Index terms: database, effectiveness, academia, construction industry, science, mapping, methodology, management practice, evidence, construction sector, green building material, machine learning, climate change
Subjects: sustainable engineering, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, climate science, specialized education, educational institutions, data management, industry analysis, performance management, management, artificial intelligence
Topics: Digital Applications, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Education, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here