Pham, V H S and Ngoc Quynh Khoi, L (2026) Artificial intelligence models to predict optimal trade-off on construction management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(1), pp. 207-228. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to introduce a novel algorithm, the Chaotic Giant Pacific Octopus Optimizer (CGPOO) and demonstrate framework includes four key aspects: time, cost, quality and safety trade-off (TCQST). Design/methodology/approach – Artificial intelligence is causing a big disruption in the construction management. It is being used to building projects to enhance efficiency, safety and decision-making. This research compared the CGPOO method to those of other algorithms, such as the Chaotic Slime Mold Algorithm (CSMA), the Chaotic Salps Swarm Algorithm (CSSA) and the Chaotic Whale Optimization Algorithm (CWOA) and assessed the efficacy of the method using statistical analysis and evaluation indicators such as Hyper-volumn (HV), Spread (Sp), Computational Time (CT) and C-metric. Findings – The analysis demonstrates that using CGPOO outperforms standalone methods chosen from the literature in terms of outcomes. It is discovered that the CGPOO solution possibilities for each factors are more efficient and beneficial than the comparison algorithms. Moreover, the CGPOO model performs better than the other algorithms with quality indices C-metric, Sp, HV and CT of 0.534, 0.531, 0.891 and 101. Originality/value – The article presents a novel hybrid CGPOO that permits multi-factor trade-offs in construction management with the goal of surpassing the analyzed models and optimizing the optimal solution in the search space.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | chaotic function; giant pacific octopus optimizer; optimization; trade-off problems |
| Index terms: | optimization algorithm, decision-making, methodology, efficiency, statistical analysis, artificial intelligence |
| Subjects: | algorithms, research methods, performance management, decision analysis, artificial intelligence, data science |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here