A systematic approach to manual calibration and validation of building energy simulation

Tomrukcu, G; Kizildag, H; Avgan, G; Dal, O; Ganic Saglam, N; Ozdemir, E and Ashrafian, T (2026) A systematic approach to manual calibration and validation of building energy simulation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(1), pp. 203-230. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to create an efficient approach to validate building energy simulation models amidst challenges from time-intensive data collection. Emphasizing precision in model calibration through strategic short-term data acquisition, the systematic framework targets critical adjustments using a strategically captured dataset. Leveraging metrics like Mean Bias Error (MBE) and Coefficient of Variation of Root Mean Square Error (CV(RMSE)), this methodology aims to heighten energy efficiency assessment accuracy without lengthy data collection periods. Design/methodology/approach – A standalone school and a campus facility were selected as case studies. Field investigations enabled precise energy modeling, emphasizing user-dependent parameters and compliance with standards. Simulation outputs were compared to short-term actual measurements, utilizing MBE and CV(RMSE) metrics, focusing on internal temperature and CO2 levels. Energy bills and consumption data were scrutinized to verify natural gas and electricity usage against uncertain parameters. Findings – Discrepancies between initial simulations and measurements were observed. Following adjustments, the standalone school 1's average internal temperature increased from 19.5 °C to 21.3 °C, with MBE and CV(RMSE) aiding validation. Campus facilities exhibited complex variations, addressed by accounting for CO2 levels and occupancy patterns, with similar metrics aiding validation. Revisions in lighting and electrical equipment schedules improved electricity consumption predictions. Verification of natural gas usage and monthly error rate calculations refined the simulation model. Originality/value – This paper tackles Building Energy Simulation validation challenges due to data scarcity and time constraints. It proposes a strategic, short-term data collection method. It uses MBE and CV(RMSE) metrics for a comprehensive evaluation to ensure reliable energy efficiency predictions without extensive data collection.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building energy simulation; cv; energy consumption; MBE; school building; validation
Index terms: data acquisition, electricity consumption, investigation, building energy simulation, energy consumption, case study, energy efficiency, accounting, consumption, mean square error, dataset, validation, variation, bias, methodology, school building, accuracy, compliance, energy modelling
Subjects: contractual condition, professional development, probability and distributions, data management, data collection methods, sustainability and energy, energy systems, research methods, health safety and environment, construction type, consumer economics, economic analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here