Fang, Y and Gao, S (2026) Construction 4.0 technology and lean construction ambidexterity capability in China's construction industry: A sociotechnical systems perspective. Construction Innovation, 26(3), pp. 653-673. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to explore the level of adoption of Construction 4.0 (C4.0) technologies and of Lean Construction (LC) ambidexterity capability in China's construction industry. By incorporating C4.0 and LC ambidexterity into a sociotechnical systems (STS) framework, this research provides practical insights for construction practitioners and companies seeking C4.0 and LC. Design/methodology/approach – The study adopts the questionnaire survey method. Data was obtained from Chinese construction professionals working on projects using C4.0 technologies. The data were analysed using mean score ranking and three nonparametric techniques, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Spearman rank correlation. Findings – According to the ranking analysis, building information modelling and offsite construction have the highest adoption level, while additive manufacturing and blockchain rank lowest. Digital technology is more widely used in China's construction industry than in physical technology. Many C4.0 technologies are significantly correlated with LC ambidexterity. Based on the STS perspective, we propose a holistic approach that incorporates C4.0 technologies and LC ambidexterity. Originality/value – Conceptually, the study incorporates C4.0 and LC ambidexterity into the STS framework. Empirically, this study fills the gap in the current literature by exploring the level of C4.0 technology adoption in the Chinese construction industry, as well as the level of LC ambidexterity capabilities. Construction companies can use this framework to make strategic decisions regarding investments in LC practices and the adoption of C4.0 technologies, such as investing in staff skill training and new technology deployment to adapt to the ever-changing environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; construction 4.0; construction industry; lean construction; sociotechnical systems |
| Index terms: | methodology, additive manufacturing, questionnaire, China, digital technology, lean construction, ambidexterity, survey, construction company, construction practitioner, construction professional, holistic approach, construction industry, blockchain, technology adoption, construction 4.0, building information modelling, new technology |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, professional development, computing systems, data collection methods, business, building construction, Geography, manufacturing engineering, research methods, innovation and technology management, strategic management, organization, digital engineering |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here