Release of construction clients' pre-tender cost estimates: An experimental study

Oo, B L (2017) Release of construction clients' pre-tender cost estimates: An experimental study. Construction Economics and Building, 17(4), pp. 37-47. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Clients engage consultant quantity surveyors or cost engineers to perform project cost estimates before calling for tender submissions. This experimental study examines the impact of releasing the clients' pre-tender cost estimates prior to bidding on student subjects' bidding behavioural patterns, and the extents to which their bidding tends to agree with the behavioural patterns proposed by Milgrom and Weber’s theory. The results show that the provision of clients' pre-tender cost estimates prior to bidding does affect bidders' bidding behaviour. Bidders with access to the clients' pre-tender cost estimates prior to bidding, on average, recorded lower bids than those with no access to the estimate. However, the lower average bids do not result in statistically significant lower winning bids. These findings provide evidence in support of Milgrom and Weber’s theory, demonstrating the practicality of an experimental approach using student subjects for testing theories in building economics research. The practical implication is that construction clients would need to consider their information policy on releasing pre-tender cost estimates to enhance efficiency in their procurement for construction services.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction bidding; experiment; information release; pre; tender cost estimate
Index terms: cost estimate, testing, estimate, construction client, experiment, building economics, project cost, evidence, bidder, bidding, quantity surveying, engineer, efficiency
Subjects: financial and cost management, profession, evaluation and assessment methods, performance management, data collection methods, professional practice, practitioner, economics, cost management, bidding
Topics: Quality Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here