The role of interpersonal distrust as a mediator of the relationship between ethnic minorities and knowledge hiding in international construction projects

Anbar, D R; Chang, T; Ullah, S; Alqershy, M T; Mousa, K and Deng, X (2026) The role of interpersonal distrust as a mediator of the relationship between ethnic minorities and knowledge hiding in international construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(1), pp. 832-855. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – This study explores the factors influencing knowledge hiding (KH) in international construction projects (ICPs), focussing on the role of ethnic minorities (EMs) and interpersonal distrust (ID). It also aims to understand how these factors influence KH and explore the mediating effect of ID on the relationship between EMs and KH. Design/methodology/approach – A survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to professionals participating in ICPs. We used structural equation modelling (SEM) to analyse 294 valid responses, examining the effect of EMs, ID and demographic variables on KH behaviours. Our approach integrates insights from social identity theory (SIT) and actor network theory (ANT) to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the observed dynamics. Findings – The findings reveal that EMs significantly influence KH behaviours, with ID partially mediating this relationship. Additionally, demographic variables such as gender and age also play significant roles in KH behaviours. However, the degree of education did not show a significant impact on KH. Our results emphasise the critical importance of addressing ID and fostering inclusive environments to reduce KH. Research limitations/implications – While our study sheds light on the complex dynamics of KH in ICPs, further research could explore additional contextual factors and organisational influences. While our study emphasises the importance of inclusive practices and trust-building to mitigate KH, it also recognises the need for a deeper understanding of power dynamics and organisational contexts. Practical implications – Our findings underscore the importance of creating transparent and inclusive cultures of knowledge sharing (KS). Implementing inclusion initiatives and providing cultural awareness training can enhance project outcomes and organisational success. We also propose a practical framework to mitigate KH by promoting trust, inclusivity and effective KS practices. Originality/value – This study contributes to the understanding of knowledge management in multicultural project teams by integrating SIT and ANT, offering a comprehensive perspective on the factors driving KH in ICPs. The findings pave the way for future investigations into power dynamics and organisational contexts within ICPs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ethnic minority; international construction projects; interpersonal trust; knowledge hiding; knowledge management
Index terms: project team, investigation, dynamics, project outcome, social identity theory, mediator, trust-building, international construction project, knowledge management, questionnaire, methodology, ethnic minority, survey, demographic variable, knowledge sharing, structural equation modelling
Subjects: research methods, demography, strategic management, project completion, psychology, knowledge management, social psychology, professional development, systems engineering, statistical analysis, data collection methods, dispute resolution, project delivery
Topics: Organizational Design, International Construction, Urban Studies, Information Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here