Mushtaq, K A B; Hassan, M U; Ahmad, T and Choudhry, R M (2026) Impact of BIM on quality of planning and design in highway infrastructure projects: SEM-based inquiry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025262, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Quality of planning and design (QPD) is crucial for the success of highway infrastructure projects. Inadequate planning and design often lead to costly change orders, rework, and delays. Although previous studies have explored various applications of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in improving the planning and design of highway projects, a critical gap exists in quantifying BIM's impact on QPD. Addressing this gap can foster evidence-based planning and strategic use of BIM features. This study attempts to fill this gap using structural equation modeling (SEM). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal component extraction clustered 17 BIM features into four categories: visualization and coordination (V&C), analysis and simulation (A&S), site conditions and safety management (SC&SM), and operations and maintenance (O&M). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validated the factor structure derived from EFA using various model fitness indices, composite reliability, and construct validity assessments and an acceptable measurement model encompassing 15 BIM features was achieved. The final SEM model, developed in AMOS and analyzed using maximum likelihood estimation, revealed that V&C (β=0.50) and A&S features (β=0.20) had a positive and statistically significant effect on QPD (p<0.05 for both). In contrast, SC&SM (β=0.04, p=0.636) and O&M features (β=0.07, p=0.377) demonstrated a positive but statistically insignificant influence. The SEM model showed that 31% of the variance in QPD was collectively explained by 15 BIM features. Despite certain limitations, this study offers a novel quantitative perspective on how specific BIM features can affect QPD in highway projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analysis of moment structures; confirmatory factor analysis; covariance-based structural equation modeling; exploratory factor analysis; measurement model; model-fit indices; partial least squares (PLS)-SEM; structural equation modeling |
| Index terms: | rework, structural equation modelling, confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, partial least square, visualization, safety management, evidence, validity, estimation, change order, variance, building information modelling, composite, highway infrastructure, coordination, highway construction |
| Subjects: | operations management, evaluation and assessment methods, materials science, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, information systems, statistical analysis, design practice, management, civil engineering, contractual condition, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here