Morley, J (2026) Energy sufficiency, space temperature and public policy. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 110-125. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Reductions in absolute levels of energy demand in the Global North are increasingly understood to be important for timely net zero transitions. Accordingly, there is growing interest in sufficiency as a basis for policy. This paper explores how indoor air temperatures, as an aspect of heating and cooling demand, might be addressed. Drawing on prior reviews, it argues that sufficiency as policymaking can be distinguished from more common interpretations of sufficiency as voluntary individual-level self-moderation or post-growth socio-economic transformation or even the direct imposition of legal consumption limits. Policies could instead be oriented towards the 'framework conditions' that shape social practices. Moreover, common ways of articulating temperature objectives, such as limits or averages, do not reflect the distributional concern that is distinctive of a sufficiency approach. By integrating insights from social practices literature, the paper outlines how a staged thermal energy sufficiency strategy might proceed through a combination of broad guideline temperature ranges and 'shift and improve' objectives for lower energy practice configurations. Working towards integrated policy packages across health, housing, welfare, energy and climate policies, this strategy would aim to create the conditions for wider debate and, over time, change within thermal norms and standards.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demand reduction; energy sufficiency; social practices; space cooling; space heating; sufficiency; thermal comfort; thermal practices |
| Index terms: | space heating, configuration, social practice, norms, housing, public policy, thermal energy, climate policy, consumption, drawing, strategy, thermal comfort, net zero, air temperature, energy demand, package, transformation |
| Subjects: | climate policy, public policy, contractual arrangements, construction type, consumer economics, sociology, thermal systems, environmental engineering, systems engineering, management, social theory, technical documentation, energy systems, mechanical systems, business |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Governance, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here