Mindful leadership and construction workers' safety citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model of team psychological safety, participative safety self-efficacy, and leader-member exchange

Meng, Q; Liu, W; Li, Z; Chong, H Y and Li, K (2026) Mindful leadership and construction workers' safety citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model of team psychological safety, participative safety self-efficacy, and leader-member exchange. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025244, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Safety citizenship behavior (SCB) among construction workers has emerged as a key concept for preventing accidents and enhancing workplace safety. Previous research has demonstrated that mindful leadership (ML) plays a significant role in fostering such behavior. However, the effects of ML on SCB have not been thoroughly examined. To address this gap, the present study collected survey data from 500 Chinese construction workers to investigate the association between ML and two types of SCB, i.e., prosocial safety behavior (PSSB) and proactive safety behavior (PASB). This relationship was examined through the mediating roles of team psychological safety (TPS) and participative safety self-efficacy (PSSE). Additionally, leader-member exchange (LMX) was incorporated as a moderating variable. The findings revealed that ML directly predicted both types of SCB. TPS and PSSE independently mediated the link between ML and SCB and also formed a sequential (chain) mediating pathway. Specifically, ML influenced PASB (e.g., voice and initiating change) primarily through TPS, while it influenced both types of SCB, particularly PSSB (e.g., helping and stewardship), through PSSE. Further, TPS enhanced workers' PSSE, which in turn promoted PSSB and PASB. The moderating impact of LMX was significant along the mediated paths involving TPS and PSSE. These findings clarify the mechanisms through which ML influences SCB, by integrating perspectives on workers' emotions, cognition, and interpersonal relationships. The findings enrich current academic literature on mindfulness and SCB and advances theoretical understanding by applying sense-making theory, social information processing theory, and conservation of resources theory to the context of construction safety. Practically, the results offer targeted recommendations and strategies for enlightening occupational safety management in the construction sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction workers; leader-member exchange; mindful leadership; participative safety self-efficacy; safety citizenship behavior; team psychological safety
Index terms: psychological safety, cognition, construction safety, construction sector, workplace safety, mediation, strategy, survey, interpersonal relationship, occupational safety, self-efficacy, information processing, construction worker, conservation, mindfulness, safety behaviour
Subjects: data collection methods, dispute resolution, data science, management, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, environmental health, practitioner, human factors and perception, environmental policy, cognitive psychology, occupational health, behavioral psychology
Topics: Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here