Yang, W and Lam, P T I (2026) A framework for foundational and transitional value assessment of non-market benefits of a smart government system. Building Research & Information, 54(2), pp. 237-256. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Smart cities prioritize citizen participation by integrating Information and Communications Technology to develop human-centric solutions. Smart government systems facilitate inter-departmental data sharing, and foster transparency, collaboration and access to open data. These systems synthesize multiple administrative services into unified one-stop portals, streamlining access and enhancing service delivery. A framework is introduced to evaluate the non-market benefits of smart government systems, categorizing them into Foundational Benefits (derived from existing departmental portals) and Transitional Benefits (representing the added value of transitioning to a unified platform). To quantify these benefits, the study employs Contingent Valuation methods alongside econometric modelling techniques, including interval regression and Tobit analysis, using Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) as a proxy measure of perceived value. Based on a survey with over 1,000 respondents in Hong Kong, the WTP estimates are extrapolated to simulate the local internet population. The benefits are aggregated to inform a Cost–Benefit Analysis. The study further emphasizes continuous improvement needs in smart government, particularly by addressing factors found to be influencing intangible benefits, including usability, social norms, open data sharing and digital divide. These findings demonstrate that smart government systems generate measurable non-market welfare gains and provide an empirical foundation for evidence-based digital policy evaluation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | digital transformation; information and communication technology; non-market valuation; smart city; smart government |
| Index terms: | transparency, modelling, internet, estimate, open data, econometric, market valuation, transformation, streamlining, continuous improvement, smart city, communications technology, service delivery, platform, Hong Kong, added value, valuation method, evidence, citizen participation, population, collaboration, survey, social norms, usability, digital divide, policy evaluation, information and communication technology |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, policy studies, innovation and technology management, economic analysis, analytical methods, digital technology, Geography, digital design, demography, social justice, urban sustainability, computing systems, data collection methods, user-centered design, business, participation process, financial and cost management, real estate economics, service delivery, professional development, performance measurement, management, data management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Ethics, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here