Li, Y and Zhong, R Y (2026) Spatial-temporal traceability and coordination in modular integrated construction: A future framework with hybrid digital twin and reinforcement learning. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(5), pp. 875-904. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Spatial-temporal traceability and coordination in Modular Integrated Construction (MiC) play a pivotal role in achieving seamless integration of lifecycle and effective management of heterogeneous entities. The significant enabler lies in multi-modal data acquisition and fusion, cyberphysical traceability, and coordinated decision-making. However, outdated information and automation technologies in MiC represent a significant barrier for the next-generation upgrade. Digital Twin (DT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) have the potential complementarity as the state-of-the-art technological fusion to offer data-driven traceability and coordinated decisionmaking. This paper conducts a systematic scientometric review through bibliometric selection and scientometric analysis for the representative literature on DT and RL-enabled MiC. 108 highquality articles are selected through academic database searches, well-defined search strings, and rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. The key challenges are identified and systematically categorized into four critical layers of DT and four core limitations of RL. A lifecycle management framework is proposed, including the controlled and programmable entities, graph-based hierarchical data management, system-of-system-level virtual modeling, multiagent decision-making, and lifecycle services in MiC. This review offers practical guidance for MiC practitioners on how to adopt a cross-disciplinary technological integration to enhance spatialtemporal traceability and coordination.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | digital twin; life cycle framework; modular integrated construction; reinforcement learning; spatial-temporal traceability and coordination |
| Index terms: | reinforcement, virtual modelling, lifecycle, automation, coordination, data acquisition, life cycle, data management, database, decision-making, integration, practitioner, state of the art, digital twin, traceability |
| Subjects: | value management, data collection methods, supplier oversight, project delivery, building materials, management, data management, organizational analysis, decision analysis, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, digital engineering, automation and robotics, digital design |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Project Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here