Pasqual, I R and Ekanayake, L (2025) Win–win approach to subcontracting in building construction: Sri Lankan perspective. Construction Economics and Building, 25(3-4), pp. 339-357. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Subcontracting has long been studied due to subcontractors' critical role in construction. However, significant issues persist, especially in developing countries like Sri Lanka, impacting project performance. These issues between main contractors and subcontractors stem from a lack of mitigation methods incorporating relationship management into traditional practices. Furthermore, most prior mitigation strategies are not favorable to both parties. This research aims to develop a "win–win" approach to subcontracting, focusing on relationship and performance management, specifically applicable to building construction. A mixed-method research approach was employed, involving literature review, questionnaire survey, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Findings reveal that effectively managing critical factors that influence both subcontracting relationships and subcontractor performance can lead to mutually beneficial outcomes. The study identified critical factors affecting the subcontracting relationship as mutual trust, good communication, and a clear understanding of the work scope by the subcontractor, while for subcontractor performance, the critical factors include time and cost management capabilities of the subcontractor, the availability of finance and working capital for both parties, and issues such as material price increase and inflation rate when subcontractors supply materials. The findings emphasize that prioritizing mutual satisfaction throughout the subcontracting process is essential for implementation. Recommendations provided in this study aim to improve these critical factors, offering practical solutions to enhance project efficiency and individual performance. This research provides valuable insights for developing organizational policies or industry guidelines, particularly for the unique challenges being faced in developing countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project management; developing countries; performance management; relationship management; subcontractor partnership |
| Index terms: | literature review, strategy, building construction, survey, developing country, interview, subcontractor, inflation, questionnaire, mitigation, partnership, subcontracting, critical factor, cost management, main contractor, performance management, efficiency, satisfaction, prioritizing, statistics, implementation, relationship management, project performance, construction project management, Sri Lanka |
| Subjects: | organization, practitioner, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, accounting and finance, Geography, financial risk, development economics, building construction, risk assessment, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, performance measurement, management, performance management, project management theory and practice, partnership management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, International Construction, Human Resources, Procurement, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here