Tennakoon, T M M P; Chileshe, N; Rameezdeen, R; Ochoa, J J and Samaraweera, A (2026) Mixed methods framework for implementation research in the architecture, engineering, construction and operations industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(2), pp. 204-218. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The adoption of novel construction technologies, practices, and policies, despite the existence of credible and feasible research, remains a significant challenge. This issue is further compounded by the limited number of comprehensive studies on research design specifically aimed at implementation. In response to this gap, the present study seeks to develop a framework that enhances the dissemination of innovative research outputs by integrating implementation science principles within mixed research designs. The research is conducted as a systematic literature review (SLR), wherein 47 relevant sources were selected following two rounds of filtration based on the preferred reporting items for systematic meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The selected studies were categorised according to their year of publication and source, employing descriptive analysis. A subsequent thematic analysis of these sources revealed the potential applications of implementation science, including the development of frameworks, policy formulation, implementation strategies, and the analysis of framework users. The resulting framework posits that implementation domains and objectives must be considered in conjunction with factors such as research priorities, function, timing, dependencies, and integration with research methods. This study underscores the importance of designing research with a focus on implementation to enhance the effective dissemination of research findings within the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | implementation; mixed methods; qualitative; quantitative; research methodology |
| Index terms: | research design, meta-analysis, research output, integration, construction technology, thematic analysis, science, dissemination, mixed method, implementation, strategy, publication, systematic literature review, construction industry, research methodology |
| Subjects: | methods and analysis, research products and data, contractual arrangements, research design and methodology, specialized education, research dissemination and communication, research evaluation and metrics, industry analysis, knowledge translation, organizational analysis, management, data collection methods, digital engineering |
| Topics: | Information Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Business Strategy, Education, Organizational Design, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here