Open repository development framework for knowledge sharing: Best practices in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry

Bosfield, R; Gibson, G E and Din, Z U (2026) Open repository development framework for knowledge sharing: Best practices in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(1), pp. 12-28. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry faces inefficiencies stemming from inadequate knowledge sharing and limited implementation of best practices. This study examines the feasibility of developing an open repository to facilitate widespread dissemination of best practices within the AEC sector. Using interviews (N = 16), a Delphi study (Round 1: N = 21, Round 2: N = 12), focus groups (Session 1: N = 10, Session 2: N = 7), and steering committee feedback (N = 10), this study reveals a lack of consensus on defining best practices, variability in internal knowledge management systems, and the potential benefits of leveraging technology for knowledge cataloging and sharing. The authors proposed a ten-step framework for creating an open repository to address these challenges, focusing on industry sectors with substantial market potential, a standardized submission template, and user communication tools. The successful implementation of an industry-wide open repository has the potential to break down knowledge silos, catalyze innovation, and foster continuous improvement across AEC organizations. However, critical challenges persist, such as securing long-term funding, developing sustainable governance models, and creating incentive structures to encourage participation. Future research should investigate these aspects and examine real-world applications of such platforms to assess their impact on project outcomes within the AEC industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: best practices; communication; construction industry; knowledge management; knowledge sharing; open-access; repository
Index terms: knowledge management, dissemination, knowledge sharing, face, industry sector, focus group, interview, variability, implementation, construction industry, funding, best practice, project outcome, continuous improvement, platform, governance, Delphi method, knowledge management system
Subjects: economic analysis, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, psychology, project completion, digital design, business, data collection methods, statistical analysis, information systems, industry analysis, knowledge translation, professional development, performance measurement
Topics: Project Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here