Sun, Y; Wang, L; Zhao, Y and Tiong, R L K (2026) Appraising institutional quality drivers of private capital participation in public–private partnership by dynamic qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(6), pp. 1078-1096. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been recognized for its significant contribution to infrastructure development in countries along its routes. However, challenges to private capital participation in public–private partnerships (PPP) are introduced by the complex institutional environment. Therefore, it is essential that the influence of institutional quality on private investment and its multifactorial effects be examined. In this study, 2854 PPP projects across 40 countries within the BRI corridor from 2009 to 2020 were analyzed using dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to assess changes in institutional quality before and after the BRI's implementation. Dynamic QCA extends traditional QCA by incorporating a temporal dimension, enabling the examination of causal patterns and evolutionary mechanisms in complex social phenomena across time. The findings indicate that no single institutional quality factor is a necessary condition for high private capital participation, although the rule of law emerges as a critical core condition within the configuration paths. Prior to the BRI, institutional quality primarily followed a 'top-down' model, which evolved into a 'top-down and bottom-up' synergistic approach after its implementation. While institutional quality plays a crucial role, its limitations in consistently attracting private capital to PPP projects are evident. These findings provide important insights for improving institutional environments to better attract private capital.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | belt and road initiative; dynamic qualitative comparative analysis; institutional quality; private capital; public–private partnership |
| Index terms: | infrastructure development, qualitative comparative analysis, configuration, partnership, rule of law, private investment, implementation, dimension |
| Subjects: | partnership management, systems engineering, health monitoring assessment and metrics, research methods, infrastructure engineering, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, legal systems |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here