Predictive modelling for contract selection in construction through data mining and machine learning: Insights from agency theory

Andalib, M (2026) Predictive modelling for contract selection in construction through data mining and machine learning: Insights from agency theory. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 22(1), pp. 138-163. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

The client-agent relationship is crucial for successful construction projects, but agency problems like adverse selection and moral hazard can weaken it if the appropriate contract type is not chosen. Previous efforts developed a multinomial logistic regression model to predict contract types based on agency theory indicators in construction projects. However, the model faced challenges with performance, complexity, data imbalance, and over-optimistic results. To address this gap, this research introduces a novel contract selection model grounded in agency theory. Using data mining and three machine learning algorithms–Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron, and pruned Decision Tree–the study improves upon prior models. The Random Forest and pruned Decision Tree outperformed the previous model with accuracies of 74.5% and 72.3%, respectively, while the Multilayer Perceptron achieved just below 70%. However, all models are more reliable due to cross-validation. The pruned Decision Tree highlights five key variables: the final product's structure and function, the contractor's experience, commitment, neighboring conditions, and human resources. The models help principals and decision-makers select optimal contract types, mitigating agency problems and promoting collaboration in construction projects. This research advances Construction 4.0's digitalization goals through a data-driven approach and provides an interpretable Decision Tree for stakeholders without technical expertise.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction project management; contracts; project controls
Index terms: commitment, moral hazard, accuracy, forest, digitalization, predictive modelling, agency, agent, machine learning, complexity, human resource, multinomial, collaboration, construction project, validation, multilayer, construction 4.0, data mining, logistic regression, project control, construction project management, adverse selection, decision tree
Subjects: financial risk, production management, environmental science, psychology, digital technology, practitioner, digital engineering, systems engineering, statistical analysis, decision analysis, sociology, professional development, project management theory and practice, specialized materials and systems, management, prediction and forecasting, data science, artificial intelligence, control systems
Topics: Risk Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here