Salguero-Caparrós, F; Pardo-Ferreira, M D C; Herrera-Pérez, V and Rubio-Romero, J C (2026) Monitoring and improving safety and health in construction activities for concrete structures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 05026004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction industry is inherently high levels of risk, particularly in tasks such as formwork for concrete structures. To enhance safety and understand workers' adaptive behaviors, this study employed the critical decision method (CDM), a semistructured interview technique that uses cognitive probes to identify disturbances that workers have to deal with in their work activity. This study focused on describing variability in formwork work on concrete structures, and understanding the resilience of workers to unexpected events. For this purpose, a series of semistructured interviews were conducted with construction employees with extensive experience in formwork work in Spain by applying the CDM adapted to the safety II framework aligned with the resilience engineering (RE) paradigm. Findings revealed that workers more frequently identified unthought-of situations - scenarios not previously anticipated by the formworkers beforehand - compared with potential unexpected situations, which are unforeseen but conceivable events as possible before the intervention. The study underscores the importance of leveraging workers' first-hand experiences to enhance decision-making and resilience, thereby improving risk assessment processes and facilitating proactive accident prevention in the construction industry. Furthermore, a key theoretical contribution of this study is the adaptation of the CDM in conjunction with RE to the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; critical decision method; resilience engineering; safety II; unthought-of situations |
| Index terms: | decision-making, interview, accident prevention, concrete structure, variability, construction industry, monitoring, risk assessment, paradigm, adaptation, Spain, construction activity, construction employee, formwork, adaptive behaviour |
| Subjects: | education and knowledge transfer, statistical analysis, environmental health, industry analysis, decision analysis, control systems, human factors, data collection methods, financial risk, Geography, structural engineering, building construction, practitioner, user focus, construction operations |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Design Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here