Seyed-Alangi, F; Parchami-Jalal, M and Noorzai, E (2026) The challenges of risk and reward sharing in the implementation of integrated project delivery contracts in the Iranian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 22(1), pp. 72-95. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) system is the contemporary contracting approach used in construction projects. However, its implementation faces many challenges due to the evolving nature of this project delivery system. Risk and reward sharing is one of the most challenging fields in IPD, and this study aims to identify and prioritize these challenges based on their importance in the project's success. The potential challenges were collected through a deep literature review and interviews. Subsequently, the most important ones were arranged in the questionnaire, and finally, they were analyzed using structural equation modeling based on the partial least squares (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that contractual challenges, compared with the other challenges, are more critical to the successful implementation of IPD. To the best of our knowledge, even though several studies have been accomplished to identify the challenges of IPD implementation, no study has focused particularly on the challenges of risk and reward sharing. This study's outcome helps construction industry experts to find solutions for the most critical challenges regarding risk and reward sharing, which leads directly to significant impacts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | integrated project delivery; IPD challenges; PLS-SEM; profit distribution; risk and reward sharing |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, construction project, partial least square, interview, profit, face, literature review, structural equation modelling, integrated project delivery, project delivery, construction industry, implementation |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, statistical analysis, industry analysis, psychology, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, production management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here