Umer, M; Wetzel, E M and Powell, C (2026) Advancing toward automated material counting and localization using RFID, a boston dynamics spot robot, and a Bayesian filter algorithm. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(1): 04025213, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The purpose of this research was the deployment and experimental testing of an autonomous terrestrial robot (Boston Dynamics Spot) for radio-frequency identification (RFID)-based probabilistic localization of construction inventory within a mockup laydown yard. The study involved designing and deploying a customized RFID payload comprising Spot overlaid with depth and tracking cameras, an RFID reader, and an RFID-based probabilistic Bayesian filter of fixed RF transmission power (BFFP) algorithm interfaced with a robot operating system (ROS) and RViz. The system was experimentally evaluated in an open laboratory setting based on its performance to read and localize tags in an unknown space. Once all installed RFID tags were localized using the hybrid system, the localization errors were calculated based on true locations. Specifically, the objectives of the study were: (1) to design and deploy a payload that leverages RFID technology, a recursive probabilistic filter for localization, edge computing, and an autonomous mobile platform for material localization in an unmapped space; (2) to adjust the original recursive probabilistic algorithm and ROS-based RViz interface for this study; (3) to calculate the power output of the RFID scanner to capture all tags while optimizing for localization; (4) to identify best practices and future research directions in automated mapping, robotic navigation, and real-time data collection for autonomous construction inventory management. According to the results, the localization error varied considerably at lower power levels (dBm). Ultimately, this study is a contributory attempt in the push toward incorporating more automation and robotics in the construction processes, especially in the wake of labor shortages and stagnation in productivity levels. Within the scope and limitations, the study answered two of the biggest challenges of autonomous inventory management on construction worksites. First, it answered "Where is my inventory?"through the BFFP-based probabilistic localization. It answered, "How much/many is my inventory?"through successful RFID tag readings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automated material count; automated material localization; Bayesian filter of fixed rf transmission power; boston dynamics spot; radio frequency identification; robot operating system; rviz |
| Index terms: | dynamics, best practice, robotics, labour shortage, automation, testing, localization, real-time data, inventory, radio frequency identification, platform, productivity, mapping, construction process, computing, laboratory, hybrid system |
| Subjects: | digital technology, urban planning, professional practice, research management, building construction, spatial and geospatial analysis, inventory management, automation and robotics, digital design, business, computing systems, data management, systems engineering, systems and processes, management, economics |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Governance, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here