Ojghaz, A S and Heravi, G (2026) An integrated BIM-GIS framework for building quality assessment based on price estimation: Evaluating design and location factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(4): 04026020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The quality of buildings is shaped largely by design and planning strategies established in the early stages of a project. Despite growing interest in data-informed decision-making, there still is a lack of integrated frameworks that enable quantitative assessment of building design and location quality before construction. To address this gap, this study proposes a framework that combines building information modeling (BIM), GIS, and machine learning to evaluate quality using building price as a practical, market-aligned proxy. A tool was developed based on this framework to support designers during the early design phase. By incorporating explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, the tool provides clear, visual feedback on how specific design and location features influence estimated price, helping users explore and refine design alternatives in real time within a BIM environment. This approach introduces a replicable, data-driven method for linking early-stage design choices to measurable outcomes. A case study in Tehran demonstrated the tool's potential to guide decision-making and improve projected market value. Although promising, the current implementation is limited by the scope of the data set and the use of price as a single quality indicator. Future research should expand its application across diverse contexts and incorporate additional quality metrics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; building information modeling; building price; building quality; explainable artificial intelligence; geographic information systems |
| Index terms: | real time, quality indicator, design phase, implementation, geographic information system, artificial intelligence, building information modelling, building design, case study, designer, estimation, Tehran, decision-making, machine learning, quality assessment, strategy |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, project delivery, management, information systems, project controls, decision analysis, professional practice, contractual arrangements, architectural design, Geography, quality assurance, geographical techniques and analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here