Gunathilaka, S (2025) Enabling team resilience against calamities through sensemaking in global construction engineering projects. Construction Economics and Building, 25(3-4), pp. 163-185. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The work teams in global construction engineering projects (GCEPs) tend to face various natural and man-made calamities that can catastrophically influence their performance; thus, enabling team resilience becomes vital. The literature shows noteworthy evidence identifying collective sensemaking as a key enabler to achieving team resilience, but this has still not been empirically confirmed and creates a knowledge gap. The global construction organizations also argue whether these teams actually need collective sensemaking for this purpose since team members will not have face-to-face interactions during times of calamities as they reside in different countries and work via virtual mode. With the results of a questionnaire survey among 52 GCEP teams, this paper concludes the positive and significant relationship between collective sensemaking and team resilience, confirming that the teams need collective sensemaking to become resilient. This finding makes an original contribution to the theory and practice in the GCEP sector and highlights the importance of much-needed attention from these teams to create collective sensemaking to become resilient against calamities. A recommendation is made for revealing practical ways of achieving this in a future study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collective sensemaking; global construction engineering projects; project calamities; project teams; team resilience |
| Index terms: | sensemaking, face, survey, questionnaire, evidence, global construction, interaction, project team, future study |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, data collection methods, project delivery, evaluation and assessment methods, strategic management, psychology, cognitive psychology, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Organizational Design, International Construction, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here