A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience

Apostu, A and Drăghici, M (2026) A public theatre as a living lab to create resilience. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 232-253. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

This case study of Masca, the first Romanian public theatre to pilot a socio-ecological urban living lab (ULL), reassesses resilience through a resourcefulness lens. It explores the challenges and opportunities public cultural institutions face in reinventing themselves as facilitators of resilience practices. Masca ULL's aims and activities are positioned as anticipated resilience practices: tried-and-tested sustainable practices cultivated through transdisciplinary collaboration and community engagement in commoning activities. Formal and informal stakeholder networks, organisational structures and key turning points in Masca's ULL process are analysed. Two emergent forms of resilience are identified: (1) the capacity to build collective resilient action despite volatile social partnerships and weak support structures; and (2) the endurance to imagine and enact alternative futures despite little government support and even little social cohesion. An untapped potential exists for cultural institutions to connect social actors and to facilitate socio-ecological resilience. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Public cultural institutions, such as theatres, have a significant potential to cultivate and integrate sustainable practices and social cohesion at local and wider scales by reassessing and expanding their public functions. ULLs can provide the setting to test and prefigure alternative models that would enable public cultural institutions to act as facilitators for stakeholders from multiple sectors—administration/governance, research, business, communities—to collaborate and develop resilient socio-ecological practices in response to the most pressing issues faced by society, e.g. ecological crises. Apart from integrating tried-and-tested resilience practices, ULLs can develop methods to identify and maximise forms of resilience to address specific local circumstances with national and global scales.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: action research; cultural institutions; imaginaries; participation; resilience; Romania; stakeholders; theatre; urban living labs
Index terms: sustainable practice, Romania, facilitator, governance, society, socio-ecological resilience, government support, partnership, case study, resourcefulness, community engagement, organizational structure, collaboration, action research, stakeholder network, face, social cohesion
Subjects: data collection methods, management, psychology, Geography, community and social dimensions, participation process, communities and social development, business, partnership management, practitioner, sociology, government bodies, sustainable practices
Topics: Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here