Thoradeniya, D; Jayasinghe, C; Ariyaratne, I E and Basnayake, G B M A (2026) Construction quality framework for school buildings: Damage detection and rectification prioritization. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(4), pp. 660-678. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This research aimed to develop a comprehensive construction quality framework for the detection and mitigation of defects in school buildings, with a particular focus on Sri Lanka. In recent years, concerns regarding the quality of school infrastructure have emerged, with reported structural damages highlighting significant deficiencies in construction processes. To investigate the underlying causes of these degradations, the study assessed the existing construction quality of school buildings, identified the common challenges and deficiencies in the process, and developed a construction quality framework. The primary data collection methods included expert interviews, which provided insights into procurement inefficiencies, questionnaire surveys that highlighted deficiencies in Operations and Maintenance (O&M) processes, and field surveys conducted in collaboration with the National Building Research Organization (NBRO) to identify prevalent construction defects and their root causes. The study established a construction quality framework that categorized these issues into three phases: pre-construction, construction, and post-construction, and prioritized them according to their order of significance. As a key recommendation, the study proposed the establishment of a decentralized regulatory authority comprising representatives of relevant stakeholders. The proposed framework offers a structured approach to enhancing the quality, durability, and safety of school buildings, ensuring the long-term sustainability of educational infrastructure globally.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building condition; construction quality; defects; school building |
| Index terms: | construction quality, construction process, school building, collaboration, mitigation, questionnaire, damages, survey, interview, building research, Sri Lanka, durability, degradation, pre-construction, construction defect, building condition |
| Subjects: | management, dispute resolution, data collection methods, contract obligations, material degradation and durability, project delivery, Geography, financial risk, quality assurance, research management, asset management, building construction, construction type |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here