Method for quality inspection during the execution of facades based on uas images and machine learning algorithms

Silva, A S; de Melo, R R S; de Melo, R S S and Costa, D B (2026) Method for quality inspection during the execution of facades based on uas images and machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(2), pp. 277-294. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This research highlights the importance of inspecting building facades for damage during construction. Manual inspections are inefficient, costly and unsafe, requiring digital solutions. The study proposes an inspection method using images from Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, utilizing ResNet and AlexNet networks on a web platform to detect defects in concrete facades during execution, supporting the Quality Management System (QMS). Design Science Research was the chosen method. It involved three empirical studies that integrated UAS-collected images, analyzed them using ML algorithms, and implemented the findings into the QMS to expedite information generation during facade execution. The method identified four construction anomalies, with an ML model correctly recognizing anomalies with up to 98.80% precision in detection and classification during testing. The generated information was integrated into the QMS via images, reports, action plans and meetings. This research contributes to the automated inspection of facades, offering optimized data acquisition using UAS, facilitating the identification of defects and supporting decision-making through comprehensive QMS integration.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automated inspection; cast-in-place concrete wall facades; construction management; quality management system
Index terms: inspection, platform, testing, quality inspection, data acquisition, empirical study, quality management system, design science research, machine learning, decision-making, integration
Subjects: professional practice, digital design, research methods, quality assurance, data collection methods, project delivery, artificial intelligence, design practice, decision analysis, organizational analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here