Exploring the role of metakaolin in binary and ternary blended 3D printable mortars: Deep insights into printability

Mishra, S K; Upadhyay, B and Das, B B (2026) Exploring the role of metakaolin in binary and ternary blended 3D printable mortars: Deep insights into printability. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(2), pp. 185-203. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study investigates the utilisation of metakaolin and GGBS as partial replacements for OPC, examining their impact on printability, mechanical properties, microstructure and hydration kinetics in binary and ternary mortars. The printability of the mixes was thoroughly assessed through measurements of flowability, extrudability, open time, yield stress, shape retention, and buildability. It is observed that shape retention improved by 46% in the OPC–GGBS–metakaolin mix and 56.25% in the OPC–metakaolin mix, while the OPC–GGBS mix showed minimal improvement. Mechanical properties were evaluated, including water absorption, porosity, compressive, and flexural strength. Printed specimens exhibited anisotropic strength, with the lowest on the ZX plane and highest on the YZ plane. The 70% OPC, 20% GGBS, and 10% metakaolin mix demonstrated superior printability and mechanical performance, supported by optimal particle packing via the modified Andreasen and Andersen model. Furthermore, the denser microstructure observed in SEM micrographs, the decrease in Ca/Si ratio from EDX measurements, the emergence of additional C–S–H and C–A–S–H peaks in X-ray diffraction, the pronounced Si–O–Si/Al stretching bands in FTIR and the increased WH% (with consumption of CH) in TGA collectively confirm that GGBS and metakaolin significantly contributed to the secondary hydration reactions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: anisotropy; life cycle impact analysis; metakaolin; microstructure; particle packing; printability; thermogravimetry
Index terms: impact analysis, emergence, consumption, water absorption, mechanical property, buildability, partial replacement, metakaolin, flexural strength, life cycle, retention, mortars (material)
Subjects: design efficiency, structural engineering, consumer economics, systems engineering, management, specialized materials and systems, water management, material properties and characteristics, building materials, data analysis and analytics, value management
Topics: Human Resources, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here