Zhou, Z; Xie, Y; Zhou, L and Zhang, Z (2026) Risk factor analysis of crane accidents based on HFACS in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(5): 04026036, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study proposes an analytical framework for examining the risk factors associated with crane accidents in construction by integrating the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS), text mining, and network visualization. An extended model, C-HFACS, was developed to systematically encode human errors and organizational influences, which were then used as structured input features for a genetic algorithm-optimized support vector machine to classify accident types. On this basis, the TF-IDF algorithm was applied to extract salient textual terms and construct feature correlation networks that clarify interrelationships among diverse accident causes. Using 130 officially published accident reports as a demonstration data set, the framework revealed that accidents were particularly frequent during disassembly and installation phases, often linked to inadequate handling of key components. The findings show that combining structured human factor coding with unstructured text mining provides a scalable approach to understanding accident causation. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by introducing a generalizable methodology that integrates human factor analysis with predictive modeling and text mining, offering practical insights for enhancing crane safety management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident analysis framework; accident reports; construction industry; human factors analysis and classification system; text mining |
| Index terms: | risk factor, mining, construction industry, methodology, human factor, visualization, body of knowledge, analytical framework, safety management, genetic algorithm, predictive modelling, disassembly |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, geotechnical engineering, occupational health and safety management, design practice, prediction and forecasting, data analysis and analytics, environmental hazards, research methods, algorithms, knowledge management, operations management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here