Monteiro do Nascimento, F A; Neto, G D M P; Hazin Alencar, L and Valdes-Vasquez, R (2026) Multicriteria subcontractor selection model for construction activities in wind farm projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(5), pp. 772-788. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Traditional subcontractor selection methods often neglect the scheduling and criticality of construction activities, leading to inefficiencies in wind farm projects. While prior research on contractor selection in wind farm projects has focused mainly on turbine suppliers, this study fills a gap by proposing a decision model tailored to selecting subcontractors during the construction phase. The model integrates discrete event simulation for activities duration estimation, line of balance for scheduling and Monte Carlo simulations to classify activities by criticality. The multicriteria decision-making process uses the FITradeoff method, which employs partial information. The model's novelty lies in integrating these three approaches for subcontractor selection in wind farm projects. The application of the model is demonstrated in a wind farm project in Brazil. The selection process prioritizes cost containment for non-critical activities, while criteria like technical knowledge, distance and experience are more relevant for critical activities. Results show an 11% average financial gain in subcontractor negotiations for non-critical activities, as their lower impact on deadlines enhances bargaining power. This study provides a construction management tool considering activity criticality when selecting subcontractors beyond turbine base construction. These findings suggest the model's potential for broader application in improving cost efficiency and schedule reliability in complex infrastructure projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; decision model; multicriteria decision making/aiding; scheduling |
| Index terms: | Monte Carlo simulation, Brazil, decision-making, line of balance, contractor selection, subcontractor, scheduling, schedule reliability, discrete event simulation, bargaining, negotiation, estimation, infrastructure project, construction phase, decision-making process, subcontractor selection, duration, construction activity, cost efficiency |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, economics, financial and cost management, tendering, modelling and simulation, conflict resolution, practitioner, operations research, project delivery, construction operations, organization, Geography, project controls, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Site Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Time Control, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here