Li, L; Cui, X; Wang, J; Jin, H and Xu, H (2026) Automated tracking of worker and heavy equipment on tunnel construction sites: Deep-learning framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(2): 04025237, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Tunnel construction environments pose significant challenges for real-time monitoring due to narrow spaces, poor lighting, and high densities of personnel and machinery. This paper proposes an enhanced deep-learning framework for automated detection and tracking of construction workers and equipment in tunnel scenarios, aiming to improve safety and operational efficiency. We developed a specialized data set comprising 2,203 images and annotated ten categories of tunnel construction objects, including workers and various types of machinery. The original YOLOv8 object detection algorithm was optimized through three key enhancements: (1) self-calibrated illumination (SCI), which improves image quality in low-light conditions by enhancing visibility and contrast, thereby increasing detection accuracy under challenging lighting; (2) multiscale attention (MA), which enhances the detection of small and densely packed targets, a common issue in tunnel construction, by focusing attention on multiple scales simultaneously, resulting in better identification of workers and machinery in cluttered environments; and (3) the adoption of the lightweight GhostNet backbone, which reduces model complexity and improves detection speed without sacrificing accuracy. The improved YOLOv8 model was combined with the deep simple online and real-time tracking (SORT) tracking algorithm for real-time multiobject tracking in tunnel environments. Experimental results show that the improved YOLOv8 model achieved a mean average precision (mAP) at 0.5 IOU ([email protected]) of 0.907, outperforming the original model by 0.8%. Precision and Recall increased by 5.4% and 5.1%, respectively. Ablation studies confirmed the effectiveness of each enhancement: The MA module notably improved the F1 score by 3% and [email protected] by 2.2%. GhostNet reduced the model's parameters by approximately 43% and increased detection speed to 86.21 frames per second (FPS). The combined Deep SORT and improved YOLOv8 model yielded an overall ID F1 score of 70.6% and multiple object tracking accuracy (MOTA) of 71.5% across four testing videos, demonstrating robust tracking performance despite challenges such as occlusions and lighting variations. The proposed framework effectively addresses the complexities of tunnel construction monitoring, enhancing both detection accuracy and tracking reliability. This advancement enables real-time surveillance and analysis, supporting improved safety protocols and operational efficiency in tunnel construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | real-time tracking, complexity, effectiveness, efficiency, variation, object detection, tunnel, module, density, accuracy, monitoring, surveillance, tunnel construction, image quality, testing, personnel, construction worker |
| Subjects: | professional practice, infrastructure and transport systems, civil engineering, contractual condition, analytical methods, computer vision, data management, practitioner, systems engineering, professional development, monitoring and control systems, architectural elements, management, control systems, performance management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Site Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Governance, Urban Studies, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here