Sands, K S and Suh, M J (2026) Roofers' perceptions on topics of heat safety. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 22(1), pp. 53-71. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
While existing research covers general construction heat safety, specific trade perspectives, such as those of roofers, are less explored. This study used a cross-sectional survey to investigate roofers' perceptions of various heat safety topics, including awareness, concern, regulations, mitigation measures, satisfaction with mitigation measures, and training. Statistical tests revealed several significant relationships and differences in roofer perception. Findings show a high awareness of the heat safety impacts of roofers and a significant concern over increased hazards due to extreme heat. Despite these concerns, opinions on the necessity for additional regulations are divided. A substantial portion of roofers emphasize the need for heat safety training, with many advocating for better practices within their companies. These findings and others underscore the urgent need for targeted research and improved heat safety protocols tailored to roofing and other trades disproportionately affected by heat safety challenges.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; heat safety; perceptions; roofer |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, extreme heat, roofer, safety training, survey, mitigation, regulation, roofing, statistical test |
| Subjects: | practitioner, climate science, financial risk, project delivery, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, political science, statistical analysis, design practice |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Project Management, Health and Safety, Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here