Fair, Autumn (2025) Reconstructing the future of inequity in black women's construction leadership a qualitative phenomenological study. DBA thesis, University of Phoenix, USA.
Abstract
The construction industry, while rich with opportunity, strong wage potential, and diverse opportunities, continues to fall short in diversity and inclusiveness. In 1978, the U.S. Department of Labor established affirmative action goals for hiring women on publicly funded construction sites, setting a benchmark of 6.8% female representation. Over four decades later, women, particularly Black and minority women, remain largely invisible across construction sectors. Increasing their presence represents a transformative opportunity to advance gender and racial equity across employment, leadership, and ownership levels. This qualitative phenomenological study examined the lived leadership and ownership experiences of Black women in the U.S. construction industry to understand how they experienced and navigated systemic and interpersonal barriers in a historically male-dominated field. Despite diversity initiatives, the industry continues to reflect significant gender and racial disparities that limit advancement and belonging. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with twelve participants, eleven of whom met inclusion criteria. Analysis followed Moustakas's modification of the Stevick–Colaizzi–Keen method to identify significant statements, meaning units, and textural and structural descriptions. Five themes emerged: systemic barriers and bias; resilience and self-advocacy; mentorship and visibility; faith and empowerment; and ownership and legacy building. Findings revealed that participants transformed exclusion into empowerment by reconstructing leadership through faith, resilience, and community impact. The study contributes to scholarship and practice by highlighting the importance of equitable leadership development, mentorship, and organizational accountability as mechanisms for advancing diversity and inclusion in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Beran, Andrew |
| Index terms: | bias, construction sector, interview, empowerment, diversity and inclusion, accountability, construction site, meaning, minority, women, leadership development, presence, ownership, disparity, construction industry, phenomenological study, employment |
| Subjects: | environmental science, training, liability law, social justice, work location, data collection methods, industry analysis, sociology, probability and distributions, methods and analysis, economics, management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Sustainability, Ethics, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here