Exploring design thinking for instructional practice

Banks-Hunt, Joan Maria (2021) Exploring design thinking for instructional practice. PhD thesis, Virginia Tech, USA.

Abstract

This dissertation entitled, Exploring Design Thinking for Instructional Practice, is situated in the cognitive rigor of design thinking instructional practice and engineering design-based capstone courses. The content of the instructional practice connects with educators employing a wide range of intellectual activities or cognitive tasks in formulating their curriculum. Key attributes of design thinking were identified through a focused literature review with an emphasis on theoretical propositions applicable to instructional practice. This dissertation contains two manuscripts: (a) an exploration of the theoretical literature related to design thinking explicating implications for instructional practice, and (b) a case study involving a small, purposive, sample of undergraduate faculty members teaching engineering design-based courses with findings broadly applicable to design processes in college curricula. The faculty participants in the case study were educators at a large, public, research-intensive university in the southeastern region of the United States. The data analyses involved triangulation of semi-structured interviews conducted with faculty participants and their design-based course materials, including syllabi and lesson plan materials. The study's thematic findings were not tied to engineering but rather course design, design process, and course management. The findings show the utility of artifact creation for learning with understanding for everyone, not just engineers and other traditional designers. Overall, the dissertation contributes to pedagogy that promotes student-centered engagement for learning with understanding. It recommends design thinking instructional practice for inclusion in designing and making artifacts of constructed knowledge for learning with understanding engagements across the academy.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Doolittle, Peter E; Wells, John G; Hicks, David and Jones, Brett D
Uncontrolled Keywords: artifact creation; capstone courses; design thinking; design-based courses; instructional practice; knowledge construction
Index terms: case study, engineer, designer, pedagogy, engineering design, undergraduate, dissertation, student-centered, United States, key attribute, interview, design process, data analysis, artifact, literature review, exploration, triangulation
Subjects: design process, Geography, environmental resource management, curriculum development, research dissemination and communication, sociology, student experience, teaching methods, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, design methods
Topics: Education, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Sustainability, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here