Utilising building component data from BIM for formwork planning

Singh, M M; Sawhney, A and Sharma, V (2017) Utilising building component data from BIM for formwork planning. Construction Economics and Building, 17(4), pp. 20-36. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Advancements in the computing realm have assisted the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry to progress significantly by automating several design tasks and activities. Building Information Modelling (BIM) authoring tools have played a significant role in automating design tasks and reducing the efforts required by the designer in redundant, repetitive or production-oriented activities. This paper explores one such approach that, with the help of BIM authoring tool and its Application Programming Interface (API), reduces the efforts expended on formwork design for concrete structures. The paper utilises the concept of using BIM data as input to compute the quantity of formwork, and generate visualisations and schedule of formwork. The developed approach first takes data input from semantic BIM to the API environment for computation and design of formwork systems, which is then placed within the BIM model, to generate visualisation and prepare schedules. The research work utilises a structural concrete wall as an example to demonstrate the presented approach. The approach will be influential in streamlining the formwork design process in the BIM environment and reducing efforts required by the designer and the planning engineer. Since the formwork elements are generated as 3-Dimensional (3D) solids and smart BIM elements, the generated model of formwork can be used for resolving clashes, scheduling, and resource planning.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; design automation; formwork design; formwork visualisation; parametric modelling
Index terms: computation, modelling, streamlining, computing, automation, engineer, building component, programming, designer, resource planning, design process, building information modelling, authoring, concrete structure, scheduling, formwork, visualization
Subjects: automation and robotics, programming, management, analytical methods, information systems, design methods, computational methods, building construction, operations research, resource management, architectural elements, design practice, computing systems, profession, coding, structural engineering
Topics: Construction Technology, Site Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here