Ensafi, Mahnaz (2022) Work order prioritization using neural networks to improve building operation. PhD thesis, Virginia Tech, USA.
Abstract
Facility management involves a variety of processes with a large amount of data for managing and maintaining facilities. Processing and prioritizing work orders constitute a big part of facility management, given the large number of work orders submitted daily. Current practices for prioritizing work orders are mainly user-driven and lack consistency in collecting, processing, and managing a large amount of data. Decision-making methods have been used to address challenges such as inconsistency. However, they have challenges, including variations between comparisons during the actual prioritization task as opposed to those outside of the maintenance context. Data-driven methods can help bridge the gap by extracting meaningful and valuable information and patterns to support future decision-makings. Through a review of the literature, interviews, and survey questionnaires, this research explored different industry practices in various facilities and identified challenges and gaps with existing practices. Challenges include inconsistency in data collection and prioritizing work orders, lack of data requirements, and coping strategies and biases. The collected data showed the list of criteria and their rankings for different facilities and demonstrated the possible impact of facility type, size, and years of experience on criteria selection and ranking. Based on the results, this research proposed a methodology to automate the process of prioritizing work orders using Neural Networks. The research analyzed the work order data obtained from an educational facility, explained data cleaning and preprocessing approaches, and provided insights. The data exploration and preprocessing revealed challenges such as submission of multiple work orders as one, missing data for certain criteria, long durations for work orders' execution, and lack of correlation between collected criteria and the schedule. Through hyperparameter tuning, the optimum neural network configuration was identified. The developed neural network predicts the schedule of new work orders based on the existing data. The outcome of this research can be used to develop requirements and guidelines for collecting and processing work order data, improve the accuracy of work order scheduling, and increase the efficiency of existing practices using data-driven approaches.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Thabet, Walid Y; Yang, Eunhwa; Besiktepe, Deniz; Afsari, Kereshmeh and Gao, Xinghua |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | work order; prioritization; asset management; maintenance; neural networks |
| Index terms: | coping, cleaning, duration, prioritizing, efficiency, questionnaire, configuration, decision-making, exploration, methodology, bias, variation, educational facility, building operation, scheduling, interview, survey, accuracy, neural network, strategy, asset management |
| Subjects: | performance management, management, professional development, probability and distributions, contractual condition, decision analysis, project controls, systems engineering, data collection methods, artificial intelligence, maintenance engineering, research methods, asset management, behavioral psychology, construction type, operations research, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here