Implementing virtual reality-based design review in the construction industry

Han, Bing (2022) Implementing virtual reality-based design review in the construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM)-enabled digitalization has been innovating the entire workflow and information management in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. Emerging visualization technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) have extended BIM-based 3D visualization to an immersive and intuitive virtual prototyping experience. VR applications have shown their potential for making construction design review tasks more effective and collaborative, thus attracting growing research attention and efforts. However, despite the increasing technological capabilities, the adoption of VR applications has still been lagging in the AEC industry, leaving the theoretical potential unrealized. One major reason for the gap between the state-of-the-art and state-of-practice is the lack of validation on VR performance. Therefore, the first research question in this dissertation addressed this issue by measuring user performance when undertaking four design review tasks using VR-based or desktop-based devices. The experiment controlled more testbed-related variables, such as functions and navigation methods, than existing VR performance validation research to reveal the contribution exclusively from VR technology. Results show that VR users can detect significantly more design errors and commit significantly fewer mistakes in scheduling installation sequence when using VR as compared to desktop-based interactions. Experiments in the first research question revealed the lack of approaches to visualize occluded objects in 3D models. In order to facilitate a comprehensive design review, the second research question proposed a semi-automatic occlusion detection framework for building information models. It converts objects in a 3D model to point clouds and overlaps them with a virtual scan of the model to identify occlusion. A ready-to-implement VR application does not guarantee industry adoption because the development cost for VR can be demanding. The last part of this dissertation proposed a Generic Extended Reality (GenXR) model that supports all XR development in the AEC industry. The author compared BIM-to-XR durations in two case studies and six XR prototype development. The result shows that the GenXR model could save over 65% of model transfer time for XR development.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Leite, Fernanda L; Caldas, Carlos; Bailey, Jakki and Nagy, Zoltan
Uncontrolled Keywords: extended reality; virtual reality; building information modeling; construction design review
Index terms: virtual reality, duration, construction industry, interaction, dissertation, building information modelling, case study, design error, 3D model, technological capability, validation, state of the art, 3D visualization, visualization, workflow, virtual prototyping, scheduling, guarantee, digitalization, prototype, point cloud, experiment
Subjects: project controls, information systems, industry analysis, management, design practice, contract structure, professional development, modelling and simulation, virtual reality, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, digital design, operations research, visualization, digital technology, innovation and technology management, professional practice, computational design, research dissemination and communication
Topics: Engineering Principles, Procurement, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here