Ketter, Jeremy Kevin (2008) The utilization of consultant construction management and construction inspection services by state departments of transportation. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Abstract
State departments of transportation are facing a need to perform a greater number of projects than in the past. The nation's infrastructure is not even close to a level that is adequate to serve the needs of its users. State Departments of Transportation (DOT) need to find ways to adequately handle all of the work that is necessary to improve their roads and bridges to a level that can meet the needs of the people that travel on them. Most of the departments do not currently have adequate staffing to perform the construction management and inspection tasks that are associated with the projects that need to be completed. Without the ability to increase their workforce by hiring, the DOTs will have to rely on consultant staffing.There are many advantages associated with state departments of transportation outsourcing construction management (CM) and inspection to consulting firms. The advantages include the ability to supplement DOT staff without having to layoff employees during slow periods, consultant CM expertise, and specialized services that the DOT may not be able to provide by itself. The disadvantages include high cost, an additional burden on DOT staff to train consultants in department procedures, and a fear of losing employees to the consulting firms.The goal of this study is to objectively analyze the use of construction management and inspection consultants by state departments of transportation. While the issue will be analyzed from a national perspective, an in-depth study will be performed on two states: one that is performing mostly new construction projects and one that is performing mainly rehabilitation and reconstruction. The State of Texas will be evaluated as a new construction state, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will be examined as the rehabilitation and reconstruction state.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | reconstruction, outsourcing, inspection, construction project |
| Subjects: | business, production management, building construction, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 P |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here