Sooksil, N and Benjaoran, V (2015) Factors that affect construction safety equilibrium: Nakhon Ratchasima construction crews perspective. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK.
Abstract
Mostly construction workers' behaviours are shaped by task objective constraints and their capability during operating the task. Their behaviours seem to be a systematic migration toward to the boundary of functionally acceptable performance. It is forced by management pressure and an effort gradient of worker. This circumstance brings those workforces to the error margin and finally ends up with the accident. This research presents the Construction Safety Equilibrium Model (CSEM) which provides a balance between task demand (TD) and capability (C). The author investigated the factors that affect task demand and capability via Delphi process. The sample group was represented by 18 employees from various construction projects in the north-east province of Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, holding positions of civil engineer, safety officer and foreman. Results of the analysis showed that 1) the most significant factors of task demand were tools factor, work quality strictness factor and work pacing factor. The least significant factor was the physical site condition factor; 2) for capability; the highest significant factors were foreman communication ability factor, worker health condition factor and foreman work experience factor. Apart from that, the job training factor was the lowest significant factor. Regarding these results, both of the lowest significant factors from task demand and capability occupied the median value over 1.5 which meant that all 35 proposed factors remained.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capability; construction safety; safety equilibrium; task demand |
| Index terms: | Thailand, construction project, construction worker, migration, construction safety, civil engineer |
| Subjects: | environmental health, production management, Geography, profession, practitioner, demography |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here