Nyalungu, Jey; Mbona, Sizwe; Ogunsola, Sijuwade and Sibuyi, Venus (2026) The effectiveness of supply chain management in enhancing project management outcomes. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 8(2), pp. 54-64. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
Supply Chain Management (SCM) plays a critical role in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of project management across various industries. This paper explores the effectiveness of SCM on project management outcomes in local municipalities, focusing on key performance indicators such as cost reduction, time management, risk mitigation, and quality control. Effective SCM integration within project management frameworks minimizes delays, optimizes resource allocation, and improves overall project performance. This paper also examines case studies where efficient SCM has led to successful project completion and identifies challenges such as supply chain disruptions, vendor management issues, and compliance risks. The study employed a quantitative research design, targeting all professionals engaged in project management and supply chain management within the Thembisile Hani Local Municipality. Data collection considered factors such as organizational size, geographic location, and historical project performance. A stratified random sampling technique was used to ensure proportional representation across various professional categories, resulting in a sample of 56 participants for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to summarize the data, while inferential analysis was conducted using Spearman’s correlation to examine significant relationships between the constructs measured. The findings suggest that companies that prioritize robust SCM practices achieve better project outcomes in terms of cost efficiency, quality assurance, and stakeholder satisfaction. Additionally, integrating SCM principles into project management enhances operational efficiency and resilience, making it a vital component for achieving strategic project goals. The research highlights how the SCM strategies, such as just-in-time (JIT) delivery, and risk mitigation contribute to enhanced project execution. By streamlining supply chain processes, organizations can mitigate uncertainties, minimize waste, and improve collaboration among stakeholders. Future research should explore advanced digital technologies and sustainable SCM practices to further optimize project success.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | supply chain management, project management, key performance indicators, resource allocation, quality. |
| Index terms: | just-in-time, integration, collaboration, cost efficiency, cost reduction, municipality, risk mitigation, digital technology, compliance, management issue, quality assurance, supply chain process, strategy, effectiveness, stakeholder satisfaction, sampling, project performance, project management, quality control, statistics, quantitative research, project success, key performance indicator, case study, efficiency, time management, resource allocation, project outcome, statistical analysis, streamlining |
| Subjects: | administrative law, organizational analysis, project controls, project management theory and practice, economics, performance management, management, project delivery, resource management, data science, participation process, data analysis and analytics, supply chain performance, computing systems, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, quality assurance, lean logistics, financial risk, health safety and environment, project completion |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here