Cloete, Brent; Agumba, Justus; Adebowale, Oluseyi Julius and Meyer, Chris (2026) From readiness to implementation: A framework for BIM adoption in facilities management organisations. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 8(2), pp. 43-53. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
This study investigates the readiness of facilities management organisations (FMOs) for adopting Building Information Modelling (BIM). Data was collected from a sample of 51 facilities management practitioners in South Africa, drawn from a target population of 209 registered professionals. The Technology Readiness Index (TRI) was applied to measure levels of optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, and insecurity towards BIM. Results show a medium readiness level (TRI score of 3.15), with high optimism and innovativeness offset by significant insecurity and discomfort barriers. Key external challenges include frequent power failures, limited owner interest, and prioritisation of initial capital costs. Based on these findings, an implementation framework is developed, consisting of a four-phase structured approach: awareness, pilot, scale, and institutionalisation. This approach is specifically designed to leverage the high Optimism and Innovativeness found while systematically mitigating the core barriers of Discomfort and Insecurity identified by the TRI assessment. The resulting implementation plan outlines strategies to overcome organisational barriers and strengthen contractual provisions for BIM integration. This research provides both an empirical diagnosis of BIM readiness and a structured roadmap for systematic adoption in the South African context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling, facilities management, technology readiness, digital transformation, South Africa |
| Index terms: | implementation, owner, institutionalization, transformation, discomfort, building information modelling, South Africa, facilities management, population, integration, practitioner, strategy, capital cost |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, sociology, information systems, management, health risk and incident analysis, business, demography, accounting and finance, Geography, contractual arrangements, practitioner |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Procurement, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here