Trushell, I and Egware, O (2015) Formal education and the practise of negotiation: Benefits for quantity surveyors. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK.
Abstract
Negotiation is the most common alternative dispute resolution processes used in the construction industry. It is cost effective and quicker than most of the other dispute resolution processes and the Quantity Surveyor is a core participant in that process. The main aims of this research were critically to analyse the negotiation styles used by Quantity Surveyors and the level of consciousness the QSs had on the negotiation styles they used. A quantitative study was undertaken using an online questionnaire survey to generate the research primary data. A total of 30 respondents, all QSs from consultant practices or contracting organizations with formal or no formal educational backgrounds, were involved in the survey. The findings indicated that three negotiation styles were most frequently used: collaboration, problem solving and compromise. The findings also indicated that QSs were not often conscious of the negotiation styles they used, but still showed that those with a background in formal education exhibited better awareness of these styles. The research concluded that formal education was seen as a worthwhile initiative for the improvement of the way Quantity Surveyors negotiate.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | formal education; negotiation styles; quantity surveyors |
| Index terms: | collaboration, questionnaire, problem solving, alternative dispute resolution, resolution, contracting organization, construction industry, consciousness, negotiation, quantity surveying, dispute, survey |
| Subjects: | management, decision-making and reasoning, contract management, conflict resolution, industry analysis, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, dispute resolution, human factors and perception |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here