Aligning visual data practices with construction decision making: Delphi-based investigation

Adegoke, A.; Akanmu, A. and Terreno, S. (2026) Aligning visual data practices with construction decision making: Delphi-based investigation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026119, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

As image-based technologies become increasingly integral to construction site monitoring, safety management, and progress tracking, understanding the decision-making processes that drive visual data use is essential. While prior research has emphasized the technical capabilities of image capture and analysis tools, less attention has been given to the human and contextual factors that shape how visual data are collected, interpreted, and acted upon in the field. Without this understanding, visual tools risk misalignment with practitioners' needs, limiting their effectiveness in supporting real-time coordination and risk mitigation. This study addresses this gap by identifying and validating the key triggers that prompt visual data collection in construction, the types of insights practitioners derive, and the visual formats that best support decision making. A multiphase research design was implemented, beginning with a comprehensive literature review, followed by a Delphi study with experienced construction professionals. Quantitative analyses using a relative importance index, median absolute deviation, and Spearman's rank correlation were conducted to assess expert consensus and prioritize visual data elements. Key findings include a ranked set of high-impact triggers, such as safety incidents, progress verification, and quality concerns. Among visual representation formats, bounding boxes, annotated photographs, and bar charts were identified as most effective for facilitating insight comprehension and action. This study contributes a validated framework for aligning visual data practices with real-world decision-making contexts in construction. It advances human-centered design of visual analytics tools by accounting for when and why visual data are collected, how they are interpreted, and what formats most effectively support communication. The results have direct implications for researchers, technology developers, and industry professionals seeking to enhance situational awareness, data relevance, and communication in construction workflows.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: decision making; Delphi method; representation format; triggers; visual data
Index terms: decision-making, practitioner, safety management, workflow, quantitative analysis, risk mitigation, accounting, misalignment, literature review, construction site, relative importance index, monitoring, construction professional, investigation, effectiveness, progress tracking, coordination, Delphi method, research design, deviation, decision-making process
Subjects: economic analysis, practitioner, engineering problems, financial risk, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, work location, control systems, risk assessment, data collection methods, research design and methodology, occupational health and safety management, project controls, decision analysis, professional development, management, performance management
Topics: Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here